Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)" Results 221 - 240 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 6:59 am
” In the next several months, the Supreme Court will decide at least a half-dozen cases about the rights of people accused of crimes involving drugs, sex and corruption. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
This law was used only occasionally until 1980, when the Second Circuit held in Filártiga v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am by JB
For this reason, Kennedy explains, the Court was wrong in Bowers v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
  A perplexing and influential record on property and eminent domain: Justice O’Connor   Justice O’Connor delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:44 am
We’ve lost sight of the fact that judges are people whose judment we must trust to do justice. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, as a general matter, the Court found that “no purpose of action against religion can be imputed to any legislation, state or national, because this is a religious people. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In addition, it is hard to reconcile Justice Kennedy’s legacy with Tushnet’s general narrative. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
The eminent case of Diamond v Chakrabarty (1980) was cited to emphasize the 'expansive' approach Congress intended Section 101 to fulfill when determining whether something was patentable to encourage ingenuity. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am by Robert D. Durham
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Williams – Yulee v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court first grappled with this in two cases in the 1980s, United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am by Ken White
Federal prosecutors generally must seek approval from "main Justice" — the Department of Justice in Washington D.C. [read post]