Search for: "German v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Thank you to "an anonymous friend" for bringing this case to my attention.In the context of a restitution motion, in United States of America v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am
Nov. 26, 1999) (awarding petitioner the cost of translating documents from German to English). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:06 am
N.V. held both German and United States citizenship. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
Bodgan Radu, a dual citizen of Romania and the United States, married Shon, a United States citizen, in 2011 in California. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
Bodgan Radu, a dual citizen of Romania and the United States, married Shon, a United States citizen, in 2011 in California. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:50 am
The article also mentions two other German venues, Munich and Dusseldorf, that are considerably faster than United States district courts. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:09 am
Intel Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:23 am
In MGM v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:25 am
Unlike in the United States, where patent cases can be filed with any of the 94 federal district courts (and can then be heard by any federal judge), only seven German courts handle patent infringement actions in the first instance (with specialized divisions focusing on patent law).All in all, Germany's share of European patent cases still appears to be growing. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
Only two things worked out well for Qualcomm on the litigation front this year: the Lasinski cross-examination and the fact that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit allowed Qualcomm's interlocutory appeal of Judge Lucy H. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
Just recently, in Riley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
The Canadian decision's in Bouzari v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 2:13 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to provide guidance (this post continues below the document):19-09-06 Sharp Letter Re. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
In MGM v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
This week at the ACCA: The Army CCA will hear oral argument in one case this week, on Thursday, April 19, 2012, in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:10 am
At issue is whether asylum should be granted to a German family who came to the United States because of Germany's mandatory school attendance law that does not permit homeschooling. [read post]
