Search for: "Gilbert v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2009, 1:10 am
  Sometimes, as here, it comes down to one Assistant United States Attorney deciding that he is going to teach defense counsel a lesson because he's pissed. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F.3d 338, 346 (7th Cir.1997)(stating that “[t]he application of Rule 23 does not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right”); In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985)(stating that the federal class-action procedure set forth in Rule 23 “is a rule of procedure and creates no substantive rights or remedies enforceable in federal court”); Southwestern Refining Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am by New Books Script
Toronto, Ont. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by cheynovi
Catalina Vásquez Villalpando: It may seem hard to believe, but the former treasurer of the United States (under the first President Bush) owes $168,000 in back taxes to the city of Washington, DC. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-1320. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-9604 Issue: Whether Missouri’s second-degree burglary statute is divisible into two offenses with separate elements for the purpose of analyzing whether a conviction under that statute qualifies as a conviction for a “violent felony” as defined in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984) (requiring that a facially content-neutral ban on camping must be "justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech"); United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-9604 Issue: Whether Missouri’s second-degree burglary statute is divisible into two offenses with separate elements for the purpose of analyzing whether a conviction under that statute qualifies as a conviction for a “violent felony” as defined in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:25 am by Jacob Dougherty
Writing for the plurality, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote: the legality of a robocall turns on whether it is “made solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States. [read post]