Search for: "Gist v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 3:48 pm
That’s why, in cases like Munaf v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 6:44 am
Hatfill v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
And he’s got chops: undergrad at Villanova, medical and doctoral degrees from Georgetown, residencies in the United States and abroad, and a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm
United States concerns the tariff classification of various glass and glass and metal decorative items that may or may not be used as candle holders. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:50 pm
On appeal, the detainee moved to supplement the record, and for a summary remand; the United States opposed this, and filed its its own motion for summary affirmance. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am
Al-Bihani v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:36 am
" Here's how attorney-blogger Paul Kennedy described the gist of the ruling:In State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
It went to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 6:34 pm
United States, 436 U.S. 238, 243 (1978): Several provisions of the Internal Revenue Code require third persons to collect taxes from the taxpayer. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm
Subsequent to the Kagenveama decision, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision that complicated things. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:42 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
" Hatfill v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:37 pm
United States Dep’t of Justice, 965 F.2d 1092, 1093 (D.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Wallishauser v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am
The worst offender in this regard is American political science, both in the sense of the sub-field that studies the United States and the scholarship and institutions (i.e. political science departments, associations, journals) of the country. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
The only decisions you have a chance of appealing up are those that deal with United States Constitution issues. [read post]
