Search for: "Givens v. Greene" Results 221 - 240 of 2,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Instead, in a footnote, it postulated that “any robust notion of cultural pluralism requires a factfinder to at least consider the possibility that the presence or absence of a given group in a given industry is the product of benign cultural preferences. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Right-Wing Think Tank Claimed to Be a Church. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 7:14 am by John Jascob
However, the defendants had attempted to follow the Delaware Supreme Court’s framework from Kahn v. [read post]
FIs should ensure that they comply with enhanced ESG disclosure requirements and can expect increasing scrutiny of purported “green investments”. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Greisberger (2nd Cir. 1996) (involving allegations that the plaintiff, an applicant for bar admission, was discriminated against based upon disability), abrogated by Green v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Myth #3: Once negative results become public, any positive spin given by management will be viewed as misleading. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 8:17 pm by Guest Author
” We will call this statute “The Green Cars Act of 2022. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Details plus some initial observations are given in July Synod: plans for “net zero carbon” by 2030. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
For this reason, most of the challenges have been factually thin—even borderline frivolous—given the robust protections the First Amendment affords political speech. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
 Those with a “green” linkage included Capt. [read post]