Search for: "Gonzales v. State of California"
Results 221 - 240
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2007, 12:53 pm
” (Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
The case accepted by the justices comes from California, where a law passed in 2000 prohibits employers from using money they receive from the state to oppose or support unionization efforts. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
Gonzales, No. 05-2337(D.D.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Gonzales, No. 05-2337(D.D.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
Kozinski also files a separate dissent, also joined by Clifton, Bybee and Callahan, argues that the Supremes in Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:23 am
" County of Sacramento v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:28 am
Siegel draws on this history to illuminate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissenting opinion in "Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:43 pm
As I noted previously, this week didn't begin at all well for various California lawyers. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
State of California Racks Up $1.8M in Fees and Counting
The Recorder
A California appeals court judge had little sympathy for the state of California last week, affirming $307,000 in attorney fees for a woman who had been granted nearly $1.5 million in fees earlier in the case over enforcement of a ballot measure concerning prison inmate wages. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 6:17 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:23 am
This opening resembles the same 5-4 majority's opinion earlier this year in Gonzales v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:45 am
He wants to stay in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:28 pm
" Numerous commentators have downplayed the significance of Gonzales v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:43 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
" — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in her dissent to Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
While he had been a strong supporter of federalism in US v Lopez and US v Morrison, Scalia held back in Gonzales v Raich, the California medical marijuana case (I'll be discussing that case further in the post). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:15 pm
Carhart and Gonzales v. [read post]
