Search for: "Goode v. Blue"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 12:10 pm
In a recent decision the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 2:46 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:16 am
"That's not good. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:26 am
(Part 2) Guest Post: I Got Dem Ol' Cathouse Blues Again Mama! [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:39 am
Kendrick v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Sure, your dreams of a Facebook-funded early retirement went up in a cloud of blue-chip smoke, and you’ve been reduced to alternating status updates between “IHML” and “BIH, Zuckerberg,” but fret not: the good folks at One First Street N.E. are more than meeting market projections for relists and holds. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
IBM's Deep Blue topped Gary Kasparov under tournament conditions. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:23 pm
Scardina v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 3:11 pm
It laid out a blue print for how to plead a case under Title VII using the disparate impact theory of discrimination. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:15 am
By Daniel RichardsonMontgomery v. 232511 Investments, Ltd., 2012 VT 31 (mem.).If you practice land use law in Vermont the phrase Stowe Club Highlands acts like a CIA sleeper agent’s trigger and will cause you to automatically rattle off the three conditions that allow you to alter an existing permit (unanticipated change in law or fact, unanticipated change in conditions, or changes in technology). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:52 pm
See Tiffany v. eBay. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 7:03 am
It is not a good design. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
This is really good advice, and most (all?) [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Well, now is as good a time as any to go through this exercise. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:54 am
US v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 4:34 am
Go BLUE! [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
While the provisions owe something to the UK (and some other European) Copyright Laws, it goes well-beyond them.* Gone with the wind: Wobben’s patent found invalid and not infringedDarren writes up Wobben Properties GmbH v Siemens PLC & Others [2015] EWHC 2114 (Pat), a decision of Birss J concerning validity and infringement of a patent covering a “Method of Operating a Wind Power Station”.* Hosepipe Ban to Continue - Blue Gentian patent upheld in… [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
Last week the Munich I Regional Court's press office confirmed to me that the Nokia v. [read post]
