Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill" Results 221 - 240 of 2,133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2021, 6:28 am by rainey Reitman
Resources Consumer Data Privacy: Equifax Data Breach Update: Backsliding (EFF) EFF’s Recommendations for Consumer Data Privacy Laws (EFF) Strengthen California’s Next Consumer Data Privacy Initiative (EFF)  Ransomware: A Hospital Hit by Hackers, a Baby in Distress: The Case of the First Alleged Ransomware Death (WSJ) FAQ: DarkSide Ransomware Group and Colonial Pipeline (EFF)  Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA): CFAA and Security Researchers (EFF) Van Buren is a Victory Against… [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:21 am by Roohie Sharma
  The Federal Court’s decision in Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers’ Union Limited v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:21 am by Roohie Sharma
  The Federal Court’s decision in Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers’ Union Limited v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am by Neil Wilkof
There, the UK IPO rejected an opposition on the ground that the opponent had failed to file sufficient evidence to substantiate its claims of reputation and goodwill regarding gin products [decision here, Opposition No. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm by Riana Harvey
The applicant relied upon the ‘extended’ form of passing off (referred to in Chocosuisse Union des fabricants suisses de chocolat & Ors v Cadbury Ltd. [1999] EWCA Civ 856), which enables several traders to have rights over a sign which has acquired a reputation on the market (and whereby - as per the UK law of passing off - such notional use by another has constituted a misrepresentation, and damage was caused).The BoA had previously found that, whilst there was reputation… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
But, New Seasons reports it has incurred “significant losses,” which may not be over: “These losses include, without limitation, the following, all of which were reasonably and necessarily incurred by New Seasons under the circumstances: (i) the expenses associated with issuing and implementing the recall; (ii) the property damage loss arising from the disposal of all of the ground beef and beef products covered by the recall (as well as the refunds issued to customers); (iii)… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
A claim in passing off could therefore not be sustained to protect goodwill that any reasonable person would consider to be trivial (Laddie J in Sutherland v V2 Music Ltd, [22]).Wenman claimed that her business was small but profitable, and that she had, since 2010, used the signs in question as descriptors of herself and the services she provided.In light of the evidence and submissions presented, HHJ Clarke was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the columns in… [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am by Saloni Khanderia
In doing so, the court placed emphasis on the position under English law as emphasized in Payton v Snelling,[2] Lampard; Reckitt & Colman v Borden;[3] and Pasquali Cigarette Co Ltd v Diaconicolas & Capsopolus.[4] The first and foremost factor, as the court stressed, would be to identify the features in the plaintiff’s product that are distinctive to him or her. [read post]