Search for: "Government's Response to Motion in Opposition" Results 221 - 240 of 1,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2010, 7:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Those parties are expected to file a written opposition shortly. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The criminal court has considered the following in reaching its decision: Defendant's Notice of Motion to dismiss the indictment and supportive papers; Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Notice of Motion to Dismiss Indictment; People's Opposition and supportive papers; Defendant's Reply and supportive papers and People's Surreply and supportive papers. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:10 pm by Scott McKeown
In light of Aqua Products, as well as public comment provided in response to a Request for Comments, the Office proposes to issue specific rules applicable to motions to amend. [read post]
Opposition leaders have repeatedly hammered the Trudeau government for its failure to conduct a public inquiry. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
Trump, Response in Opposition to Motion for partial stay pending appeal, before U.S. [read post]
This response was in reply to the Justice Department's Aug. 30 filing opposing Trump's Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
In order to allow the Government sufficient time to consider these numerous new legal issues and to more carefully respond to Plaintiffs’ motion, the Government respectfully requests a two-week extension of time to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction.The FDA wants until July 2 to file its brief. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court allowed plaintiffs' Title IX sexual harassment claim to go forward; it didn't discuss the claim in detail, but here's the plaintiffs' argument from their opposition to the motion to dismiss: Importantly, "[t]o be actionable as sexual harassment, the unwelcome treatment need not be based on unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
Connell replied that the holder of classified evidence has a responsibility to determine the need to know of those to whom he or she would disclose classified information, and that additional security guides beyond those excerpts already provided by the government would be helpful to the defense teams and their DISOs. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:16 am by Michael Geist
Of course, the only votes in opposition to the motion came from Access Copyright board members, so it may not welcome the debate as much as it suggests. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:07 pm by Michael Geist
The short response is that Sookman's column - along with his clients - downplay the dramatic impact of their proposed amendments. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
The options open to the Court, if it agrees with the federal government's views on Michigan's underlying legal claims, include simply denying the motion to reopen the old litigation, treating the case as a motion for permission to file a new Original complaint and then denying it, or leaving Michigan free to formally file a new motion for leave to file. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
See excerpt from its filing below: The Bureau also did not oppose the motions to intervene filed by Ambac, the insurer for some of noteholders as well as an investor.Below is the text of the Bureau’s motion response in opposition (admittedly not very reader-friendly since the cut-and-paste from pdf does not work well with footnotes and formatting). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 11:26 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
” Attached is Roger Clemens’ filing on 7/29/2011 with its exhibits: Defendant’s Motion and Memorandum of Law to Prohibit Retrial and to Dismiss the Indictment Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Text of Proposed Order Attached is the government’s response on 8/19/2011: Government’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Prohibit Retrial and to Dismiss Indictment (Dkt.… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:39 am by Evan D. Schwab
The Court can make a ruling based on information presented in the motion and opposition at the time of the hearing if the Court so chooses. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Although the Government failed to point that fact out in its opposition to Cohen's motion, E. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 10:16 am
In the end, then, while the district court had harsh words for the manner in which the federal government constructed and maintained the levee and canal system, it granted the defense motion to dismiss the claims against the government. [read post]