Search for: "Graham v. Waters"
Results 221 - 240
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Judge Graham also required Corn Plus to implement an Environmental Compliance Plan and a Code of Conduct as well as retain a full-time Environmental Health and Safety manager. . [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
Comer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 12:53 pm
., Nov. 30: Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
Graham County Soil and Water Conservation Dist v. ex rel. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:51 am
The defendants argued that the relator’s allegations were disclosed in three ways, each of which the Court rejected: To the state Department of Health and Welfare (Judge Shubb ruled that, under Ninth Circuit precedent, disclosure to a state fraud investigator cannot constitute a public disclosure); During an audit by the state agency (the Court noted the pending case of Graham County Soil & Water Dist. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:25 am
Industrial Carriers Inc., defendants-appellees
NEW YORK COUNTYReal PropertyFree With Registration: Respondent Must Abate Nuisance, Perform Specific Repairs Regarding Water Seepage Matter of Laub v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:51 pm
In Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:40 am
Lower courts have disagreed as to whether state reports and audits were intended by Congress to raise that bar.The underlying lawsuit alleged fraud by a water conservation district in the use of federal disaster assistance.The case is Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
The case will be argued in October: it is Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
The whistleblower case, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Solicitor General in agreeing to hear Graham County Soil & Water, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Cases in which the Solicitor General filed an invitation brief: Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:44 pm
Mac’s Shell Service, Inc, which will be on the June 11 conference; No. 08-304, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 8:16 am
" At issue in No. 08-304, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:19 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
Graham, and V. [read post]
