Search for: "Green v. Clark" Results 221 - 240 of 309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP finance) What a concept: sharing new inventions with the world is good for the inventor (Techdirt) Global - Copyright On verifying the Commons (Creative Commons) Australia High Court rules on contributory patent infringement: Northern Territory v V Collins & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) Valuating IP: reputation in trade marks and section 60 evidence? [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Clarke County Includes the cities of Athens and Winterville. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Green would call “a dog that did not bark”—in this case, a criticism not made. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Osborne Clarke and Bristows published articles summarising the guidance. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
[This presumably gives the green light to speculative drafting]  For the same reason, the Respondent’s argument that the specification of the Patent is insufficient must fail [132-139]. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
William Funk (Lewis & Clark), Ofer Raban (U. of Oregon), and Kyu Ho Youm (U. of Oregon); and bloggers Prof. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
The Texas Supreme Court granted review, and by a 6-2 vote, reversed and remanded.1 The majority opinion was written by Justice Hecht, and joined by the Chief Justice, Justice Wainwright, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]