Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 221 - 240 of 2,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2011, 9:11 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Greenhouse points to Rehnquist’s 1978 dissent in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
A followup to my post yesterday on the origins of Linda Greenhouse's much-talked-about story on the gap in legal research in the Supreme Court's Kennedy v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:46 pm by Joe Koncelik
Greenhouse Gas Regulation Commences January 2, 2011 without Legislation On May 13, 2010, EPA finalized its regulatory approach for control greenhouse gases (GHGs) from large stationary sources. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:52 pm
All I'll say is that if you want to see the work of someone with total and majestic command of a subject, take a look at Linda's coverage of the court's role in Bush v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:13 pm
Lest it be said that yesterday's Supreme Court ruling on greenhouse gases was a lot of hot air, one would be well advised to visit SCOTUSBlog for its depth and variety of coverage and analysis of Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Nov 2003, 12:52 pm
Lidster, while Linda Greenhouse reported on the same case in the New York Times (as noted in [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
The case follows another recent related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
EPA - in making regulatory law more democratic - may supersede the immediate consequences for greenhouse gas regulations.Mass v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
” In other words, the Court wants to know whether the EPA was required to apply Section 165 and Title V of the Act to greenhouse gases once it regulated GHGs from motor vehicles. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Ann Carlson
Supreme Court — that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:48 pm by Nathan Koppel
The High Court released four opinions today, including this one in American Electric Power v. [read post]