Search for: "Grey v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here),  following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as Gandalf… [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am by Robert Chesney
In my previous post, I explored the extent to which the Munaf v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Originally called Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), the case of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein was marked out by the IPKat as a thunderously bad decision when the Court of Appeal reversed the decision of Kitchin J at [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Rosalind English
Of all the domestic cases on the right to education, the most important  is A v Head Teacher and Governors of Lord Grey School [2006] UKHL 14, [2006] 2 AC 363; this ruling reinforced the Belgian Linguistics principle that under A2P1 a person is not entitled to some minimum level of education judged by some objective standard and without regard to the system in the particular State. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:32 am
The opportunity to provide the resolution to that question came in Texas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:04 pm by Parker Higgins
At another point in the hearing, lawmakers pressed the FBI's Amy Hess on the role of third-party “grey hat” hackers in accessing the data on the iPhone at the heart of the hotly contested “Apple v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 9:18 pm by John Collins
John Collins and Sumer DayalClayton Utz This question was tackled by the Full Federal Court of Australia in Kafataris v Davis [2016] FCAFC 134. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Shutterstock/Matthias Pahl – grey computer mouse connected to a grey globe Citing to authorities on acting, Judge Kozinski says that even if the director controlled all aspects of her performance, the actor still imbues her performance with sufficient creativity because she must “live [the] part inwardly, and then give to [her] experience an external embodiment. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is what the City Council wanted in enacting the law, and this is how the state courts are now interpreting it.The case is Suri v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:42 am by Jani
ISCC's patents cover the use of cells in a state where they cannot possibly be fertilized and multiply, thus not, under the Court's current considerations, be classified as a 'human ebryo', and be exempt from patenting. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]