Search for: "Growth Properties v. May"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Pirani v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Property tax limitations typically allow for some rate of growth and usually feature override provisions under which voters can approve growth outside the cap when additional flexibility is needed. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Resources Code, § 21166(a); CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15162(a), 15153(a); American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
As to a third plant, a special status species, the appellate court also found that the administrative record contained sufficient evidence to support a fair argument that mitigation through onsite preservation or offsite restoration may not succeed, and therefore there may be a significant impact. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
(Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:39 pm
On June 12th, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, filed its decision in Golden Door Properties LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
Walt Disney Company | The Chalk Pencil infringement claims have been erased: Lanard Toys v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Lucas and Giorgianni v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
Since 2006, Congress and the President have proclaimed that the month of May is Jewish American Heritage Month. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Taxpayers may claim a maximum credit of $2,000 for each child, with a portion of the credit refundable. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm
The Legislature sought guidance from the Colorado Supreme Court, asking:[W]hether language in article V, section 7 of the Colorado Constitution limiting the length of the regular legislative session to “one hundred twenty calendar days” requires that those days be counted consecutively, or whether the legislature may, during the exceptional circumstance of a public health disaster emergency, count only “working calendar days” toward the 120-day… [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
Ayotte v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
The revenue thresholds may be designed around companies like Google and Facebook, but Maryland businesses—including many small businesses—are the ones actually paying. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm
(Citing Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
That is, a qualified employee may work for a competitor even during the term of employment. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
Joel Gott Wines, LLC. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 12:16 am
Errors in Section 8 Notices There has been a useful case on section 8 notices, Pease v Carter, which solicitor David Smith has written up in this article on LinkedIn. [read post]
