Search for: "H. D." Results 221 - 240 of 15,551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(d) If the notice is faulty in any way, the court can use any error in the notice as a reason to deny relocation and even punish the would-be-relocator with a sanction. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[Justice Jackson explained that an ambiguous text should be interpreted in favor of expanding democracy. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:04 am by Dimitris Vallindas and Anton Gerber
Powers to effectively combat gun-jumping of must-screen transactions (Proposal, Art. 4(2)(h)). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
The court concluded that “[h]ere, there was no evidence presented at trial from which the jury could have rationally found that Defendant committed the lesser offense[s] . . . because the State’s evidence is positive as to the element of serious bodily injury and there is no conflicting evidence. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The federal H-2B visa program permits U.S. employers to temporarily hire nonimmigrants to perform nonagricultural labor or services. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Veilleux, 2023 QCCDPHA 60  [1] Le 20 décembre 2021, l’Hôpital Fleurimont transmet deux ordonnances à la pharmacie où travaille l’intimée. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[The case raises an issue of high importance and the opinion may contain some loose reasoning.] [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A newly announced religious discrimination settlement reminds employers of the advisability of reviewing and strengthening the defensibility of their grooming, dress code, scheduling and time off and other employment policies, practices and other procedures for applying, granting or denying religious exceptions, and other employment practices to defend against potential discrimination exposures in light of rising religious sensitivities, the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  In support of this very broad proposition, the CRSCC cites In re Griffin, in which Chief Justice Chase, sitting by designation, wrote that the disability “create[d]” by Section 3 is “to be made operative … by the legislation of congress in its ordinary course. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Tobin Admin
§ 33-7-11(d), against Progressive Insurance–the plaintiff’s own insurance company through UIM. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
” Pennsylvania Law Weekly (Jan. 15, 2024).Source of image:  Photo by Arturo D on www.pexels.com. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Harris, Director of the Franklin D. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:19 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
About the Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: ERISA & Employee Benefits,” “Health Care” and… [read post]