Search for: "HATCH v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 2:20 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
The Court of Appeal was right to hold that it does not matter whether criminal property existed when the prohibited arrangement was first hatched. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Second, the federal RFRA is unconstitutional when applied to state law under Boerne v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
Hatch-Waxman partially adapted the Changes-Being-Effected (CBE) policies outlined in the FDCA. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Given Trump's admiration for Andrew Jackson and his hostility to the "deep state," flouting the Hatch Act would be on brand. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States, 273 U.S. 236 (1927) and TransCore, LP v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm by Matthew Flinn
Lumba A similar question had been addressed by the court in R (Lumba) v Secrteary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 – another case involving the detention of a foreign national prisoner. [read post]
This week a panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals handed down an important decision for consumers in Alaska and other western states. [read post]