Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL V. UNITED STATES " Results 221 - 240 of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nevertheless, IOSCO members (like the United States) regulate 95 percent of the world’s securities markets. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process… [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
Bruns went to [his] home on June 7, 2010, and spoke to [Sedelsky] and his aunt, Jody, who also lived in the residence. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The case involving a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act is Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Bill Marler
The products are typically cooked by consumers from a frozen state, which increases the risk of the product not reaching the internal temperature needed to destroy Salmonella. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
My own inclination is toward the global and away from the edifices of the law state system and its international public law based architecture (e.g., Backer, Larry Catá, On the Evolution of the United Nations’ 'Protect-Respect-Remedy' Project: The State, the Corporation and Human Rights in a Global Governance Context (June 3, 2010). [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
Lawmakers’ content- or viewpoint-based intentions generally don’t invalidate facially content-neutral speech-restrictive laws, see United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]