Search for: "HOUSE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 221 - 240
of 13,796
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
In the course of considering certain "Special Situations" (p. 29), we consider who all might have authority to enforce Section Three with respect to the constitutional ineligibility of an individual for the office of President of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Unlike Europe’s comprehensive privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the United States only has a conglomeration of laws that target specific types of data. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
In defining that test, the Supreme Court in Joseph relied heavily on the decision of the House of Lords of Kemsley v Foot [1952] A.C. 345. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
What they did have in common was a goal: to keep President-elect Lincoln from the White House. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You may also hear references to the Incompatibility Clause which provides, “no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:39 am
Same-Sex Marriages As of right now, Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
The Incompatibility Clause of Article I, Section 6 says that "no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
House of Representatives of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
In 1938, Congress established a nine-person Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise Committee with representatives from the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
That argument isn’t at issue in the case: Everyone agrees that if Donald Trump was subject to Section 3 as President, and if he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021, then that conduct rendered him legally ineligible to serve as President or in the other covered state and federal offices (absent action by two-thirds of both houses of Congress to eliminate that disability). [read post]
