Search for: "HUGHES v. THE STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
(rejecting per se inadmissibility of eyewitness expert witness opinion testimony). [9] State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 8:00 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
Miami Herald v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
Justin Hughes: Isn’t an easy solution to allow consumer to sue under qui tam provisions where the state AG could do so? [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:19 am
As for the injunction request, though it has yet to be properly examined in court, Judge Hugh R. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:52 am
Oklahoma State Regents” The winner of the 2020 Hughes-Gossett Award for best student paper is Rachael E. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:56 pm
Citing a 2008 Seventh Circuit case that in turn quotes the 1987 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm
One of the first university cases ended up before the United States Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:47 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:18 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:04 am
Recently, however, Hatch-Waxman plaintiffs in Celgene Corporation v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
” In particular, Justice Gorsuch notes that the majority in Nixon v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Hughes v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Walker (The Ohio State University), on Friday, December 3, 2021 Tags: Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Statement by Chair Gensler on Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act Posted by Gary Gensler, U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:24 pm
ShareMonday’s argument in Hughes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Patel v. [read post]
