Search for: "Hague v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2013, 2:22 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court observed that Congress enacted ICARA to establish procedures for implementation of the Convention in the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
N.Y., 2020) Petitioner Dror Nissim (“Dror”), an Israeli citizen, and Respondent Orna Kirsh (“Orna”), a dual United States and Israeli citizen, were married in 2008 and had a Child who was a dual United States and Israeli citizen born in Israel. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Petitioner filed this action against Respondent and alleged that Respondent wrongfully retained the children in the United States without Petitioner's consent starting on January 7, 2013. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:42 am
United States of America), 2008 Alfred Boll, Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
Pennacchia did not meet his burden on acclimatization, and therefore, the district court did not err by concluding SAPH’s habitual residence under the 1980 Hague Convention remains the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
Second, taking care of the Children may require that Respondent travel to Europe, or the Children visit the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 11:00 am by Liisa Speaker
The father seeks to have his children returned to the United Kingdom from the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:20 am by Louis M. Solomon
United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 482 U.S. 522 (1987), but did not discuss whether that case permitted it to ignore the Hague Convention entirely in performing the comity analysis, as we discuss in our e-book, International Practice: Topics and Trends. [read post]