Search for: "Hale v. Harm"
Results 221 - 227
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Jun. 26, 2009)(O'Neill) (admissibility of expert testimony, methods of appraising value of condemned property, here billboard easement)(exclusion of expert witness testimony was erroneous and harmful, judgment reversed) THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:04 am
Should an improper verdict form submitted to the jury in this case be subject to the harm analysis described in Almanza v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:01 am
Should an improper verdict form submitted to the jury in this case be subject to the harm analysis described in Almanza v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
His Lordship felt there were three basic propositions of law to consider and apply: (a) it was not enough to give rise to a duty of care that harm was foreseeable (Dorset Yacht Co v Home Office [1970] AC 1004); (b) the law did not ordinarily impose positive duties to protect others (Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd 1987 SC (HL) 37; (c) the law did not impose a duty to prevent a person being harmed by a criminal act of a third party merely because such… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 5:10 am
S.L. v. [read post]
