Search for: "Hale v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
However, art 51 limits the CFR’s application to “only when” member states “are implementing Union Law”. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am
This definition is lifted directly from Council Directive 98/59/EC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (the “Collective Redundancy Directive”). [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
The much-anticipated judgment in MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64 has now been delivered by the Privy Council, and the decision was not as all had expected. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
Entertainment Merchants, concerning a State's ability to restrict the sale of violent video games to minors and the First Amendment right to free speech; Snyder v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale made clear that the question for the local authority (following on from Birmingham CC v Ali – our note here) is essentially about the future, ie the probability of the acts continuing in the future (“This is the limiting factor. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
Hale v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Eagle v Chambers The reference to Eagle v Chambers (above) is of particular interest of course because the judgment of the Court of Appeal in that case was delivered by Lady Justice Hale (as she then was). [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
In the hearing Lady Hale remarked that it is “always much more satisfactory to think of the child as a real person and name the child”. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
Dissenting, Lady Hale agreed with the principles discussed by Lord Wilson, but held that the Government failed to strike a fair balance between the very limited public benefits of the cap and the severe damage done to the family lives of young children and their lone parents. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In relation to the first issue, Lord Reed in his judgment (with which Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge agreed) noted that the decisions taken under rule 45(2) in these two cases were not taken by the Secretary of State, but instead by a senior prison officer or “operational manager”. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
With reference to Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 213, Lady Hale accepted that refusing for religious reasons to perform some aspects of a j [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Requests Ronan Lavery QC not abuse Lady Hale’s politeness. 11:27: Ronan Lavery QC submits the Government’s policy would be constitutional. [read post]
