Search for: "Hamburg v. Hamburg"
Results 221 - 240
of 615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
[We have the following call for papers from the Albrecht Mendelssohn Bartholdy Graduate School of Law at the University of Hamburg.]We would like to invite everybody interested in the study of the history of international law in Latin America to participate in our call and to submit proposals for contributions on any of the listed subtopics (see below). [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 11:32 pm
A call for papers has been issued for a conference on "Latin American and International Law," to take place February 8-9, 2018, at the Albrecht Mendelssohn Bartholdy Graduate School of Law, University of Hamburg. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
Crossley, “Case Law, Hamburg District Court: Max Mosley v Google Inc”, online: Inforrm’s Blog”. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 6:44 am
Rick Garnett, Notre Dame Law School; and Goodwin Procter LLP partner Thomas Hefferon, discussing Murr v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:42 am
KSR v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 8:01 am
I’ll be speaking about the Nelson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts Last week, California-based burger chain In-N-Out sued Denver-based Smashburger, alleging infringement and dilution of trademarks including DOUBLE-DOUBLE and TRIPLE TRIPLE (for, among other things, “hamburger sandwiches and cheeseburger sandwiches”). [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:28 am
In Romer v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:39 am
This is why Spokeo was presumed to be subject to the FCRA in the recent Supreme Court case, Spokeo v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes E. coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body, as well as on the tail, or flagellum,[2] and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 2:29 am
The Court referred to two CJEU decisions (Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der Deutschen Bühnen (C-267/06) and Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (C-147/08)), which confirmed that unless evidence establishes that there would be unacceptable economic or social consequences of giving effect to the deceased’s entitlement to a survivor’s pension for his husband, at the time that this pension would fall due, there was no reason that he should be subjected to… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm
The speech was part of a short trip to Poland prior to the G20 Summit in Hamburg today. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm
Circuit Court’s refusal to adjudicate Jaber v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
I German TV show allowed to call right wing politician 'Nazi sl*t', Hamburg court rules I Latest leak reveals that review of EU IP enforcement framework is currently in a deadlock I Sunday Surprises, Around the IP Blogs
[read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
I German TV show allowed to call right wing politician 'Nazi sl*t', Hamburg court rules I Latest leak reveals that review of EU IP enforcement framework is currently in a deadlock I Sunday Surprises, Around the IP Blogs
[read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Google (see “Case Law, Hamburg District Court: Max Mosley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
š v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
I German TV show allowed to call right wing politician 'Nazi sl*t', Hamburg court rules I Latest leak reveals that review of EU IP enforcement framework is currently in a deadlock I Sunday Surprises, Around the IP BlogsNever Too Late 147 [week ending on Sunday 7 May] Deterrence sentencing for copyright infringement: Court of Appeal gives guidance I AIPPI Event Report: Will the Unwired Planet v Huawei FRAND judgment lead to fewer NPEs? [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm
” [Lowering the Bar on Ninth Circuit decision in Santopietro v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
”, Guest Kat Stephen Jones shares his insights on Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
