Search for: "Harms v. IRS"
Results 221 - 240
of 426
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 3:26 am
” Tarasoff v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 11:40 am
The British press has made much of the injunction granted by the Court of Appeal in PJS v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:54 am
Tuesday’s argument in Sheriff v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 10:18 am
Sounds like Bush v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
However, what’s missing from the discussion is some good old-fashioned common sense, which today’s Stark on IR posting now introduces into this 21st Century technological and legal firestorm. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:26 am
” I wrote a piece on that very subject last year, quoting from the IRS’s DLOM Job Aid and experts in the field. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 11:42 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed Jan. 19 to hear United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed Jan. 19 to hear United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
The lawsuit also alleges that the conduct of the drainage districts, together with the conduct of similarly situated districts, contributes to a single, indivisible harm Point Source Bottom line, the DMWW complaint is asking a federal court court to do what no other court or state or federal agency has done: declare farm drainage tile to be a “point source” subject to CWA regulation. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
Will small businesses be harmed? [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 5:36 pm
” That competition could cause harm and therefore, the court reversed the lower court’s decision and agreed that the AICPA has standing to proceed. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed (Katz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Nkansah, 699 F.3d 743 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding intent to harm is necessary); United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
” Tagore v. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 5:49 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) With this post Flora Sapio and I (and friends from time to time) continue an experiment in collaborative dialogue. [read post]
