Search for: "Hawes v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2007, 12:21 am
" See, e.g., Marsh v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:24 am
The court first discussed its earlier opinion in State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:01 am
Local 5 v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:48 pm
City Council of City and County of Honolulu, 72 Haw. 513, 823 P.2d 742 (Haw. 1992), in which the Hawaii Supreme Court stated unequivocally that "[a] basic tenet of municipal corporation law is that an ordinance which conflicts with an express provision in a charter is invalid. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 6:39 am
Molokai Ranch, Ltd., 119 Haw. 163, 194 P.3d 1126 (2008), held that a private party had no standing to enforce the state's land use laws. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:52 am
P'ship, 198 P.3d 615 (Haw. 2008); City of Stockton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 11:35 am
Haw. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:57 pm
Haw. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Regular in-state purchases insufficient.Rawlins v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:26 am
Haw. 10/21/9) and DK & AK by Kellet v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:03 pm
City Council of City and County of Honolulu, 70 Haw. 361, 370 (1989). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Supreme Court in cases like Lochner v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:40 pm
State of Hawaii, 122 Haw. 34, 222 P.3d 441 (Haw. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:01 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:42 am
Bulgo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 4:16 pm
State, Board of Land and Natural Resources, 112 Haw. 161 (2006). [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:23 pm
Lyman, 68 Haw. 55, 704 P.2d 888 (1985), indicated that it would not interpret the "public use" provisions of article I, section 20, of the Hawaii state constitution as broadly as the United States Supreme Court has interpreted the corresponding provisions of the fifth amendment. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:32 pm
Nakazawa v. [read post]
