Search for: "He, et al v. Holder"
Results 221 - 240
of 412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Holder, and Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Litman The decision in Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Citing Monsanto Co. v Scruggs et Al., the court held that the purchaser of a patented technologies which can replicate itself is not authorised to use replicated copies of it, as this practice 'would eviscerate the rights of the patent holder'. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:07 pm
Abdouch v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm
Baltimore Ravens and NFL, et al. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
(Judge Denny Chin dissented, but he was outnumbered two to one.) [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Directors may be removed at any time by the votes, cast to that effect by the holders of the majority of the subscribed shares with a voting right in the elections of directors. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
And most informed observers would agree, I think, that as a result of our government’s counterterrorism efforts, spanning both the Bush and Obama Administrations, and which have included targeted lethal force against known individuals, the U.S. homeland is safer today from a terrorist attack launched by al Qaeda from overseas. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
Steele, et al., No. 27-CV-13-3463 (Minn. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
Holder and Arizona, et al. v. [read post]
