Search for: "Hernandez v. New York" Results 221 - 240 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Spano: Is New York's High Court Ready to Recognize Out of State Same Sex Marriages? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am by John Elwood
New York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), and, to a lesser extent, Rice v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 8:29 am by Kevin Sheerin
Matter of Anne Baldwin v Tino Hernandez, as Chairman and Member of the NYC Housing Authority Petitioner brought about this Article 78 proceeding to review a determination from the New York City Housing Authority that permanently excluded her son from her public housing apartment. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on Tuesday, October 13, in two cases that might provide a vehicle for the court to weigh in on the question whether same-sex couples who marry elsewhere are entitled to have their marriages recognized in New York. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:44 pm
Hernandez, 874, 6597/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 5188; 63 A.D.3d 571; 880 N.Y.S.2d 489; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:54 pm
Finding Defendant "May Have" Caused the Deletion of "Possibly Relevant Emails," Court Orders Sanctions, Including Payment to Local Bar Association - David Bowerman of K&L Gates on the firm's Electronic Discovery Law blog Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 8:14 pm
New York’s judicial position with respect to permitting same sex marriage is currently articulated in Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:00 am
" When the New York County Supreme Court dismissed Kaisman's case, he appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]