Search for: "Hill v. Day" Results 221 - 240 of 2,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Svetlana S. Gans and Natalie Hausknecht
The divided vote, which broke down on partisan lines, stands in stark contrast to recent bipartisan efforts on Capitol Hill, particularly on the comprehensive American Data Privacy and Protection Act (ADPPA). [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm by Michael Lowe
Ring camera videos on YouTube can be fun: there are bears in backyard pools and cute kids in doorways. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Former ministers are banned from lobbying ministers for two years after their last day in office. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
The committee also spaced its hearings out, usually sticking to just two a week, which gave the news cycle time to chew over the contents of each day’s events before the committee convened again. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Emma Snell
In the 2013 report from the Justice Department inspector general, investigators said they did “not believe” Joseph V. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:30 pm by Karen Tani
" On September 21, 2022 , at 12:00 p.m, EDT, in honor of Constitution Day, the Supreme Court Historical Society will, via Zoom, screen its newest documentary, on Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 19 July 2022 Johnson J heard an application in the case of Hills v Fomukong Epse Tabe. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am by John Jascob
The president’s signature came five days after first the House and then the Senate passed the Act by votes of 423-3 and 99-0, respectively, within four-and-a-half hours of each other. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
Rebecca Beitsch reports for The Hill. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J heard an application in the case of EGC v PGF NHS Trust. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
“I mean, you got people walking in — it was late at night, it had been a long day. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Under such circumstances, the respondents acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within a reasonable time after the expiration of the 90-day statutory period (see Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d 1064, 1066; Matter of Gershanow v Town of Clarkstown, 88 AD3d 879, 880; Matter of Gelish v Dix Hills Water Dist., 58 AD3d 841, 842; cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Under such circumstances, the respondents acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within a reasonable time after the expiration of the 90-day statutory period (see Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d 1064, 1066; Matter of Gershanow v Town of Clarkstown, 88 AD3d 879, 880; Matter of Gelish v Dix Hills Water Dist., 58 AD3d 841, 842; cf. [read post]