Search for: "Holmes v. State of California"
Results 221 - 240
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Schwarzenegger, the constitutional challenge to California’s Prop 8. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
MN Mining and Mfg (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Delay alone does not establish prejudice necessary for prosecution laches defense: The Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
MN Mining and Mfg (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Delay alone does not establish prejudice necessary for prosecution laches defense: The Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Dodge is a Professor of Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
" United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
United Airlines (7th Cir. 1971); Regents of University of California v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
In addition, he voted in University of California v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
That is more the function of state Supreme Court judges dealing with issues of state constitutional, statutory and common law, and even they are frequently constrained by federal constitutional law and federal preemption of state law. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm
The California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
Varian, Chief Economist, Google; Professor, University of California, Berkeley What we all know: decline in circulation, despite increase in revenue per subscriber. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
" Holmes v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
As Justice Holmes said in a different context in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:08 am
State v. [read post]
