Search for: "Holt v. May"
Results 221 - 240
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Re an application by Central Craigavon Ltd for Judicial Review, heard 15 May 2013. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anor and related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anor and related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:15 am
In January 2016, she received orders to report to a new station in Willowbrook, Illinois, almost four hours from the plaintiff’s home in Holt, Michigan. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:26 pm
, O Centro, Lukumi, Holt v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
The officer may do so by reliable electronic means. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
In the words of the hearing officer: As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a “counseling memorandum” that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file constitutes a lawful means of instructing the employee concerning unacceptable performance and the actions that should be taken by the individual to improve his or her work. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm
Judge Atlas agreed with GE, citing the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:28 am
See Holt, et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:39 pm
Moreover, religious freedom statutes need not be objectionable—they can provide necessary protections in cases like Holt v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
FTC, 13-534 (ditto); Holt v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:58 am
By Scott Holt and Lauren Moak [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:43 am
For example, in Messa v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 1:22 pm
Hunt v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:40 pm
Holt’s Cigar Co.; Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:03 am
"The Appellate Division modified Supreme Court's ruling, reversing so much of that decision that vacated the arbitrator's determinations on Grievance Two and Grievance Three.* In Holt v Board of Education, 52 N.Y.2d 625, the Court of Appeals said that performance evaluations and letters of criticism placed in the employee's personnel file were not "disciplinary penalties" and thus could be placed there without having to first hold a disciplinary… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 10:16 am
O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006) (win for religious exemption from the federal drug law banning hoasca, a hallucinogen) and Holt v. [read post]
