Search for: "Houston v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2008, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court's 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 9:07 am
– Houston (14th Dist.) [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm
On September 8, 2011, the Second Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 5:48 am
Labourdette Jr. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:05 am
In Tagore v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 5:11 am
The case is styled, Patricio Delgado v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 7:12 am
The case is, Eleazar Cantu, Jr. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
It is a 1972, Houston Court of Appeals [1st District] case styled, Latham v. [read post]
Arrested for Assault? Why You Need a Skilled Houston Criminal Lawyer When Accused of Assault Charges
31 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm
Like these other states, Texas no long utilizes the term “rape” in its Penal Code. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
V. [read post]
19 Oct 2024, 6:35 am
The opinion is styled, Raynelle King v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:16 am
The case is styled, Braulio Reyna v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:45 am
Paxton further stated of the arrest: In Texas, life is sacred. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
21 Dec 2024, 6:48 am
The opinion is styled, Dora Doss Thompson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
This matter, styled United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
The statute at issue states that the Director may not authorize an inter partes review to be instituted unless the Director determines that the information presented in the petition filed under section 311 and any response filed under section 313 shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition. [read post]