Search for: "Huntington v. Huntington" Results 221 - 240 of 390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Further, the injuries alleged by the petitioners fell within the zone of interests to be protected by SEQRA (see Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods. v Town of Sardinia, 87 NY2d at 687; Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 772-775; Matter of Bloodgood v Town of Huntington, 58 AD3d 619, 621; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d at 94). [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:14 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Further, the injuries alleged by the petitioners fell within the zone of interests to be protected by SEQRA (see Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods. v Town of Sardinia, 87 NY2d at 687; Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761, 772-775; Matter of Bloodgood v Town of Huntington, 58 AD3d 619, 621; Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 45 AD3d at 94)." [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Discipline involving alleged off-duty misconduct Local 342 v Town of Huntington, 52 AD3d 720 Local 342 brought an Article 75 action seeking to vacate an arbitrator’s award based on a “finding that the Town had just cause for suspending [an employee] from his position with the Town. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
Judicial review of disciplinary determination of guilt is limited to considering whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence Barthel v Town of Huntington, 2012 NY Slip Op 05738, Appellate Division, Second Department The Director of the Department of Human Services of the Town of Huntington adopted the findings of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law §75, which the employee guilty of certain disciplinary charges… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by admin
  Great house: can you move it over the San Gabriels to Huntington Beach? [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:12 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 In Pennsylvania, punitive damages may be awarded “when the plaintiff has established that the defendant has acted in an outrageous fashion due to either the defendant’s evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others,” Phillips v. [read post]