Search for: "I T T Corp"
Results 221 - 240
of 11,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 5:03 pm
Cal.) in X Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 2:20 am
Antero Resources Corp . v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Judge Weinstein observed that when the hand waving stopped, “[t]here is no evidence that plaintiffs were exposed to the far higher concentrations involved in both animal and industrial exposure studies. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
District court: I said don't you dare mention the domestic violence. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
” Reading the trial court’s decision, I’m somewhat skeptical of the finding of an ambiguity requiring parol evidence, for a few reasons. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:20 am
” Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm
As Gurbir Grewal, the Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, has said, “You simply can’t ignore the rules because you don’t like them or because you’d prefer different ones: the consequences for the investing public are far too great. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
I mean, defendant is shady, dude. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:29 am
As another great philosopher said, ‘I can’t change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 am
Director Gerding closed his statement by offering reassurance that in the first year of the rule’s implementation, Corp Fin isn’t looking to “make ‘gotcha’ comments or penalize foot faults,” and that to the extent appropriate, it may issue “future filings” comments or additional CDIs. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm
See Union Carbide Corp . v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001) [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
But fair use isn’t a defense to a breach of contract claim. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:25 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
M&F Worldwide Corp.,, the Delaware Supreme Court adopted a novel mechanism by which the judicial standard of review of interested controlling stockholder mergers would shift from entire fairness to business judgment if a transaction were structured using procedural “protections” in the form of approval by both an independent committee and a majority of minority stockholders. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
This issue arose in the context of calculating lost profit damages in a 1995 decision of the en banc Federal Circuit, Rite-Hite Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:58 am
Sanofi is an important case, but it won’t transform patent law on its own. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
Laufer relied on Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:00 am
I can’t remember. [read post]
