Search for: "IN RE: RULES FOR DISTRICT COURTS OF OKLAHOMA"
Results 221 - 240
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 8:01 am
Oklahoma, Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
In re Askin, 47 F.3d 100 (U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Also, we’re lazy. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Limousine drivers for UberBLACK are not employees of the ride-share service under the FLSA, a federal district court in Pennsylvania ruled. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[25] The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26] In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice,… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
Munsingwear, and thus improperly relied on the district court’s factual findings and legal rulings in an earlier case that was vacated as moot while on appeal, even though other courts of appeals have interpreted Munsingwear as rendering a vacated decision a nullity, as if it the case had never been filed, and draining its factual findings of all vitality; (2) whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit misconstrued… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
They’re running a little behind this year, so it looks like the last opinions will come down Tuesday or possibly even Wednesday of this week. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
The district court affirmed the plan and Truck appealed. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm
MDL No. 2385, which is formally known as In Re: Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation, includes individual lawsuits that were originally filed or removed to federal courts located in Florida, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Connecticut, Illinois, Ohio, New York, and Louisiana. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm
MDL No. 2385, which is formally known as In Re: Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation, includes individual lawsuits that were originally filed or removed to federal courts located in Florida, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Connecticut, Illinois, Ohio, New York, and Louisiana. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
A federal court ruled in favor of the agency in 2008, and the groups countered with an appeal. [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:01 am
However, this may exclude and wages that may be taken to satisfy court judgments. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Give it several months to up to a couple years before the court issues a ruling. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
The most significant of these rulings was the al Odah case, in which a panel that included Judge Garland held early in the line of detainee cases that federal district courts lack habeas corpus jurisdiction over the Guantanamo detainees’ claims. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(IP Osgoode) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Second District Court declares Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute unconstitutional: Rogers v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
A federal District Court judge in California reportedly stayed a lawsuit against Dignity Health—one of the largest healthcare systems in the country—by an operating room nurse who claims that Dignity Health’s insurance policy is “discriminatory” because of its “refusal to provide insurance coverage for medically necessary” sex-reassignment surgery. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
A three-judge panel of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals had largely upheld a lower court ruling restricting Trump’s speech in the case. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
The District Court concluded that the highway checkpoint seizure in Appellant's case was not constitutionally flawed. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:52 pm
’ In fact, it’s been quoted on the masthead of the publication you’re holding for decades. [read post]
