Search for: "IN RE DERRICK S." Results 221 - 239 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2008, 8:17 pm
Haerle joined Lambden in his opinion.The case is In re Crockett, 2008 S.O.S. 718. ..more.. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Mukasey, No. 07-2215 "Petition for review of a final order of removal, arising from a conviction for petitioner's grabbing a police officer's fingers and twisting them, is granted and the matter remanded where the BIA's finding that petitioner's state crime of "aggravated battery of a peace officer" was a crime of moral turpitude, was based on a misapprehension of Illinois law. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:20 pm
He has told me that if we’re before a jury, he would appear with a tie. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:40 pm
"We're just not going to go forward with execution dates, although we're still trying cases as death penalty cases," said Assistant District Attorney Roe Wilson of Harris County, which includes Houston and accounts for a quarter of Texas executions. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
"If you've ever had that done, you know that one second you're aware and the next second the operation's over. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
"If they make a decision that says it's not cruel and unusual, that it's not unconstitutional, then we'll go forward, ... and I'll schedule a new date. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
State of Indiana - "The court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence or by prohibiting the re-opening of McDowell's case. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 5:23 pm
I then pulled up and stopped at the back passenger's side of Agent Derrick's vehicle. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
The justices said they would hear the case of Derrick Kimbrough in the fall. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 8:56 am
First you said you had Derrick's back, but two hours later he was gone like Billy Ray Bates. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
The Fourth Circuit in an unpublished opinion, Derrick Walker v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
They're suspected of deciding what outcome they want, based on their own personal or ideological preferences, and then writing a legalistic, neutral-sounding opinion to cover up what they've done. [read post]