Search for: "IN RE HOWARD MINOR" Results 221 - 240 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2009, 10:05 pm
  On top of that, the story goes, there were few important questions that remained to be answered and not only minor contributions left around the margins. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:42 am
If you're feeling overwhelmed by your debt and you know you need help, Howard | Nassiri can help. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Howard University, No. 08-204*TVII/Workplace stalkingPetition for Rehearing to be considered 1-9-09o SCOTUS docket hereo *Rehearing denied 1-12-09Federal Appellate Court Decisions> Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here10th Circuit> Chapman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
"We're not asking for favors, " we are just asking for a level playing field," Howard said. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Howard University No. 08-204*TVII/Whether workplace/campus stalking constitutes sex harass + other issues described hereo SCOTUS docket hereo *Petition denied 11.17.08Gross v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:22 am
Being lawyers at heart, they pay attention to minor differences between the answer they are given and the answer they want. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
She is a woman on fire, a woman on a mission to help others enter (and re-enter) society as productive and contributing members of their community. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 9:48 pm
It’s time for us to re-examine the wisdom of locking up some first-time, non-violent drug users for decades. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Brattain, No. 07-1594 A sentence for aggravated sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded for resentencing where, contrary to the district court's conclusion, the district court's refusal to apply an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 4B1.5(b) was error because defendant qualified as a repeat offender, and Congress explicitly revised the enhancement to apply to repeat-offenders who abuse only a single victim. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 4:48 am
Howard Zonana, psychiatry professor at Yale University and medical director of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
Sure, if you're a conservative who believes the Second Amendment protects a personal right to self-defense, you're happy to be able to say "see, I'm not just some right-wing gun nut. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Terry, No. 07-3757 Denial of a motion to suppress evidence in a prosecution for possession of images of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct is affirmed over claims that a search warrant permitting federal agents to search defendant's home was not grounded upon probable cause, and that the search therefore violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – Roche appeals preliminary injunction barring US sales of Mircera in patent infringement battle with Amgen: (Philip Brooks), (IP Law360), Norvasc (Amlodipine) – Ranbaxy becomes first foreign generic company to develop a generic product independently outside Japan and receive authorization from MHLW-Japan:… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Griffith, No. 07-50531 Defendants' sentences imposed on remand for their participation in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine are affirmed where: 1) under the mandate rule, defendants waived various objections regarding certain defendants' requests for a decrease for minimal or minor participant; 2) the district court erroneously concluded that the mandate rule precluded other defendants from raising objections to their conspiracy sentences for minor or minimal… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:55 am
In the summer of 1995, he stabbed his estranged wife and her companion, killing the man, Howard Wilson. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 6:41 am
  And, you know, they're not the same.The Court resoundingly told prosecutors (and defense attorneys, at least in theory) throughout the country that if they're going to strike members of definable minority groups from a jury panel, they need to work out more plausible explanations.In other words, they need to plan it out beforehand.It's always seemed perfectly obvious to me that any halfway-intelligent… [read post]