Search for: "IN RE JUDGE ANONYMOUS"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
The Panopticon Blog also has an article on the recent case of NHS Business Authority v Information Commissioner & Spivack [2021] UKUT 192 (AAC) and how the decision affects the problem data controllers encounter when principally anonymous datasets can re-identify data subjects when taken with other publicly available information. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Then on that statistical basis, if one assumes that H had intercourse with 250 clients during the period in which conception could have occurred (a figure towards the upper end of the range postulated by the trial judge, there would only be less than one chance in four that all three contraceptive methods would fail on at least one occasion.) [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Then on that statistical basis, if one assumes that H had intercourse with 250 clients during the period in which conception could have occurred (a figure towards the upper end of the range postulated by the trial judge, there would only be less than one chance in four that all three contraceptive methods would fail on at least one occasion.) [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:45 pm
Judges cannot minimize the First Amendment rights of anonymous speakers who use an organization’s logo, especially when that use may be intended to send a message to the trademark owner, EFF told a federal appeals court this week. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Bd. of Bar Examiners, decided today by Magistrate Judge Steven C. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:05 pm
Federal Judge Edward G. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:09 am
And, at a follow-up meeting, the director "says, 'You're a law student, and there's a bar you have to take. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
This request can also be submitted by a non-anonymous relative, the court, law enforcement officer, judge, or concerned citizen. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
"[5] At the same time, such claims are by their nature hypothetical, and some judges view them as too speculative.[6] [3.] [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12] [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12] [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
Is there some reason to think that the judge might be biased in favor of or against the litigant? [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
In what follows, I seek to (a) lay out the general legal rules, as reflected in court decisions (which I hope will be useful to judges and lawyers as well as academics) and (b) lay out the main policy arguments cutting in favor of and against pseudonymity. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am
Going back as far as 2009, Westchester County Court Judge Rory Bellantoni adopted the Dendrite test in determining whether to order the disclosure of an anonymous blogger. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals said it will not re-examine a decision that overturned many of Alaska’s most important limits on campaign contributions. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
It is unclear, however, whether Chinese publishing houses secured the rights to re-publish the novel from Rooney. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:54 pm
That’s why we urge Congress to pass the Protecting Data at the Border Act, a bill recently re-introduced by Sen. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Presumably the district judge thought something similar here (though likely with regard to medical privacy rights rather than the anonymous speech rights involved in Publius). [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article, Bronwyn E. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Ninety-nine percent of the time, when we're talking about major policy decisions, we're effectively talking about delegation to the President. [read post]
