Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 221 - 240
of 15,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2016, 1:00 am
Research broader rules, analogous facts or doctrines, and⁄or the law of other jurisdictions. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:57 pm
Add on top the fact that ethics rules are continually changing to keep up with new technology (or not). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 9:40 pm
We’re disappointed by this misguided ruling, but the case is far from over. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:12 am
The DOL re-emphasized in its final delay rule adopting release that its focus during the period before January 1, 2018 and for some time after will be on compliance assistance. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:13 am
However, it has continued to be used even after the dangers of COVID-19 have become less of a concern. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The ruling in In re Baby would refuse to enforce such agreements, in effect requiring the intended paren [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
She applied the standard of review of “reasonableness”, meaning that the PMRA’s decision would stand as long as it was both logical and rational, and fell within relevant factual and legal constraints (such as rules imposed by the law governing the PMRA, principles of statutory interpretation, past practices and decisions, etc.). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
She applied the standard of review of “reasonableness”, meaning that the PMRA’s decision would stand as long as it was both logical and rational, and fell within relevant factual and legal constraints (such as rules imposed by the law governing the PMRA, principles of statutory interpretation, past practices and decisions, etc.). [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:03 am
Apart from the roundtables, I’m pleased to note that PTAB continues to have great success in hiring talented new judges with strong and relevant technical and legal backgrounds. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:03 am
Apart from the roundtables, I’m pleased to note that PTAB continues to have great success in hiring talented new judges with strong and relevant technical and legal backgrounds. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:13 am
“[8] To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology, engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal education requirements to which the lawyer is subject. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am
As Tom Engelhardt explains, in a great new piece on TomDispatch, which he kindly allows me to re-post here, by failing to bring wrongdoers to justice while instead prosecuting whistle blowers, we are indeed becoming a country that is no longer governed by the rule of law. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Or, rather, what used to be the economic loss rule in the State of Washington, and which has now been re-named and re-vamped as the independent duty doctrine. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
A rebuilt rules engine now scans your documents faster than ever. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:01 pm
“The 80-20 ‘rule’ was not a binding legal standard but was born out of a wage and hour operations handbook,” Kahn says. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:03 am
It’s cut and dried, you were married, now you’re not. [read post]
Louisiana Department of Health Issues Emergency Rules Impacting Pediatric Day Health Care Facilities
23 Sep 2016, 1:24 pm
Finally, the Emergency Rules clarify that a parent, legal guardian or legally responsible person providing care to a medically complex child in a home or any other extended care or long-term care facility is not considered a PDHC facility and shall not be enrolled in the Medicaid Program as a PDHC services provider. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:43 am
If the tolling rule is legal, then its application is barred by the Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:18 am
We hope that we’re wrong about the implications of the court’s ruling and that California courts will take steps to prevent abuse of unmasking subpoenas. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Teamsters Local Union No. 21, 2008 SCC 20, did not change the rule that that it is an infrequent case that requires the employee to accept re-employment in order to mitigate her damages ( as was held by Chief Justice McEachern in Cox v. [read post]
