Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: F. A. G. R., A CHILD"
Results 221 - 240
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Here is the contents: Anne Röthel/Evelyn Woitge: “Das Kollisionsrecht der Vorsorgevollmacht” – the English abstract reads as follows: Various European national laws have recently implemented powers of representation granted by an adult to be exercised when he or she is not in a position to protect his or her interests. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:08 am
The Eleventh Circuit tried to figure out the extent to which past bad behavior can be used to enhance a sentence for child pornography. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to order of Court of Appeals to… [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
” Public and Private Hearings The general rule under CPR 39.1 is that a hearing is to be in public unless; (a) publicity would defeat the object of the hearing; (b) it involves matters relating to national security; (c) it involves confidential information (including information relating to personal financial matters) and publicity would damage that confidentiality; (d) a private hearing is necessary to protect the interests of any child or protected party; (e) it is a… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
R. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm
That is an interesting issue that will probably be litigated one day. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm
This poses a very interesting and troublesome challenge to anyone who operates a website which caters for or may even be aimed at children. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 9:02 am
This poses a very interesting and troublesome challenge to anyone who operates a website which caters for or may even be aimed at children. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
Court Rules, comment 1.1 on R. 4:50-1 (2003)). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:46 am
” R. 4:64-1(f). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:15 pm
F. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this paragraph upon proof of a violation of N.J.S.2C:17-1 which resulted in bodily injury to any emergency services personnel; or (9) Knowingly, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, points or displays a firearm, as defined in subsection f. of N.J.S.2C:39-1, at or in the direction of a law enforcement officer; or (10) Knowingly points,… [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
Lauren R. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
R-88-3658. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am
R. 1:6-6; Conforti v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
R. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Krusen, 678 S.W.2d 918 (Tex. 1984); James G. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
This expanded search is tantamount to a warrantless search, and, yet, the government tried to defend its actions when Carey moved to suppress the evidence of child pornography. [read post]
