Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF M. J. H., A CHILD" Results 221 - 240 of 270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
As time ran out before the discussion could be concluded, no vote was taken to approve the draft.Between the 2014 meeting and the upcoming meeting of the ALI, a number of ALI members have raised some objections to the approach to be taken by the project's reporter, Stephen J. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Shunting Aside Chevron Deference August 7, 2018 | Jonathan H. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
 The Sun on Sunday agreed to pay “significant libel damages” to Sir Elton John and David Furnish over an allegation that their dog inflicted “Freddie Kreuger-like injuries” on a child. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Mandelman
Direct response, back then, was the ugly step-child to the general advertising world. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
However, fairly obviously there are two criteria:• Domestic• Violence[4] In general terms, domestic violence occurs in a relationship of a domestic nature, typically husband and wife or de facto partners, whereas family violence occurs in a broader family relationship, eg parent to child.[5] The mistake that is often made is to fail to recognise abuse that is not physical, which can clearly be identified as domestic violence.[6] A useful definition, as good as any out there, and… [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
On Monday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit issued an important Internet free speech opinion, NetChoice v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 On a school bus or in a vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat. 145 (l)(h) “Qualifying Qualified patient” has the same meaning 146 as provided in s. 29, Art. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 On a school bus or in a vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat. 145 (l)(h) “Qualifying Qualified patient” has the same meaning 146 as provided in s. 29, Art. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:44 am by Christiana Wayne
Provide legal support to the Director, NSA. m. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
Being a devolved matter, this step requires the Central Government to obtain the approval of a Northern Ireland Department (Roinn i dTuaisceart Éireann) and the Scottish Ministers (Mhinistearan na h-Alba).[31] Furthermore, this approach also implies that there will be no comparable exclusion of insurance matters as under the HCCH 2005 Convention.[32] However, the Responses contemplated making use of the bilateralisation mechanism in relation to the Russian Federation upon its… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Utah’s bigamy statute is overinclusive as to any interest in preventing fraud, domestic abuse, or child sexual abuse. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am by Michael Lowe
From the Guideline, here is the complete Loss Table: (1) If the loss exceeded $6,500, increase the offense level as follows: Loss (apply the greatest) Increase in Level (A) $6,500 or less no increase (B) More than $6,500 add 2 (C) More than $15,000 add 4 (D) More than $40,000 add 6 (E) More than $95,000 add 8 (F) More than $150,000 add 10 (G) More than $250,000 add 12 (H) More than $550,000 add 14 (I) More than $1,500,000 add 16 (J) More than $3,500,000 add 18 (K) More than… [read post]