Search for: "In Re: Mathes v." Results 221 - 240 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2018, 1:59 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Here’s how the math works: Let’s say that you buy a house for $300,000: That’s your cost basis. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 8:49 pm by David Cheifetz
I’d written, in a comment: One question the writers of “legal eduction” studies might ask – perhaps they have, I’ve never bothered to look – is “what does it tell us about law as a discipline that so many people who claim they’re no good at math, sciences, philosophy, logic etc. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
If you're a believer in precedent, you look at what the Court said in 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:02 am by David Lat
If you’re not familiar with how it works — warning: math is involved — just read our detailed post from last year. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:27 am by SHG
CERTIORARI DENIED… 13-1012 VANGELDER, TERRY V. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fromer: want to be sure we’re covering large businesses v. small businesses with less sophistication that may not know what’s actually available. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm by Russell Knight
This, we conclude, constitutes substantial compliance with Supreme Court Rule 201(k)” John Mathes & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
” [via 8th Circuit’s Clerk Office] In re: William Turner, 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
(Otherwise we'd have to prosecute by math.) [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Which brings us to Minnesota v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]