Search for: "In Re CDA"
Results 221 - 240
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2018, 9:47 am
Yet Plaintiff Doe was not a minor at the time of the events at issue—she was twenty-six years old So obviously we’re not dealing with the best-drafted complaint. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 3:54 am
While Dennis Prager is busy spewing the right wing narrative, because they’re pissed that private companies aren’t treating them “fairly,” (and it makes no difference whether they are or aren’t; it has no place in this issue), the left side, which has historically hated its inability to dictate what you should be allowed to see and read, is no better friend to § 230. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm
Nevertheless, under the CDA the Court's hands are tied. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:05 pm
Or what if another bozo re-posts the same material? [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
* In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability Litigation, 2010 WL 3720406 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:27 am
The complaints allege that these services are slow to pull infringing content and, even when that content is pulled from a website, it reappears soon thereafter, being re-posted to those services once again. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:03 am
" I think this is a correct synthesis of current precedent (especially after Rescuecom), but it misses the broader context that we're talking about a review site selling ads to support its editorial content. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:13 am
*Notably, most of the CDA was held unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 3:15 am
https://t.co/K6HtJZF2xq 2018-08-14 The WIPO Internet Treaties: New Zealand Will Soon Join 97 Other Countries as a Member https://t.co/Cz295kwNLx 2018-08-14 In a Divided Opinion, California Supreme Court Squashes End Run around CDA Immunity https://t.co/f5ocaz6S9X 2018-08-14 A Cautionary Tale of Sarcasm in Social Media–Ross v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
In Germany, we’re leveraging Cisco Networking Academies to roll out Webex. [read post]
14 Sep 2006, 6:32 am
It doesn't seem we really have one, at least not unless the poster (i) identifies himself or herself, (ii) is in the same jurisdiction as the victim (which makes suing a much more viable option) and (iii) has enough money to pay a substantial damage award (or at least pay the plaintiff's attorney's fees if he/she wins).This is leading some to call for re-criminalizing defamation. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:04 am
No DMCA, no CDA. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
If you're one of those people who thinks a burger can never have too much meat, good luck working on that bad boy. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:02 am
And then the other major U.S. law is Communications Decency Act 230, generally known as CDA 230, which is a very broad immunity for most other kinds of claims for anything that’s not intellectual property or a federal crime. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:27 am
The user responsible for the publication may, following the requirements of article 21, counternotify the service provider, requesting the continued availability of the content and assuming exclusive responsibility for the eventual damages caused to third parties, in which case the service provider will have the duty to re-establish access to the content to which access was disabled and inform the complainant of the re-establishment of access. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
CDA 230: LinkedIn also raised a Section 230 argument, saying that the emails were third party (i.e., users’) content. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 1:33 pm
We're not much wiser in terms of Twitter policy than we were when we started. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:33 am
Reno (CDA I District Ct. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:34 am
and GeoCities were big lobbiers for 512(c), though, and they're the precursors to MySpace, YouTube, etc. [read post]
