Search for: "In Re CDA"
Results 221 - 240
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 11:59 am
They’re not afraid of Facebook, because fundamentally they’re built on the principle that their citizens can freely communicate with whomever they choose and however they choose about whatever they choose. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:14 am
KH: There is a point of real-worldness, where you’re not regulating what’s going on inside the [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
(I thought she might also reference CDA Sec. 230 here as well, but she didn’t. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:34 am
As always, if we're going to be at the same conference or if I'm traveling to your area and you would like to try to meet up in person, please email me. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:16 am
Privacy is the pivotal issues for Web 3.0’s success, just as the CDA’s Safe Harbor provision has been the enabler for social media, and Fair Use was a legal enabler of the Web’s early days. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am
Pacifica [Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978)], the scope of the CDA is not limited to commercial speech or commercial entities. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
* In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability Litigation, 2010 WL 3720406 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 6:24 pm
What is going on here is CDA Section 230 in action. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
Everyone agreed that once upon a time a rough global consensus on limited liability, based around the notice and takedown (NTD) paradigm, had been achieved c 2000, with the standout exception of the US’s CDA s 230(c), which provided total immunity to service providers in relation to publication torts, but which was seen in the EU at least as something of a historical accident.Since then, however, twin pressures from both IP rightsholders seeking solutions to piracy, and states keen to… [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:51 pm
They’re not the only firm that will be offering the report, but because they’re backed by CDA Law Center, I certainly consider them to be one of the best. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:27 am
The user responsible for the publication may, following the requirements of article 21, counternotify the service provider, requesting the continued availability of the content and assuming exclusive responsibility for the eventual damages caused to third parties, in which case the service provider will have the duty to re-establish access to the content to which access was disabled and inform the complainant of the re-establishment of access. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
The point is that all the Defendants in this case—with the exception of Cannon—acted as re-publishers of another person’s information, and as such they are protected by the CDA. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
That’s the version of the statute we’re dealing with. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:05 am
If you’re limiting the claim, it should be integrated with the claim itself: no separate disclosure required. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
TechLawJournal has a thorough analysis of Justice John Paul Stevens’ opinions in technology-related areas. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
CDA found a number of troubling practices at the dairy. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:42 pm
CDA found a number of troubling practices at the dairy. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:06 am
For example, did the board re-nominate a director or continue to have the CEO serve as Chairman because he is well liked by management or the board? [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:39 pm
(Compare the Quiznos analysis—they’re fundamentally incompatible, I think.) [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
If you're one of those people who thinks a burger can never have too much meat, good luck working on that bad boy. [read post]
