Search for: "In Re Cross"
Results 221 - 240
of 18,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2018, 3:34 am
A new rule from Betsy DeVos would require universities to allow accused sexual abusers to cross-examine and re-traumatize their victims. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
When asking "why," you're giving them a chance to explain. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:53 am
According to an incomplete tally in Friday’s proxy, the top five Global Crossing execs stand to receive almost $77 million, plus up to another $12.6 million in severance if they’re fired. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Just a quick hat tip to my other blog, Rock Island Workers Compensation Attorneys… A new case came out holding that shoulder injuries are to be considered part of the body as a whole, not part of an arm. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:32 am
Because cross examination is more about showing the client’s side of the story, than providing the court with a complete picture, attorneys can choose which story they’re trying to tell, and decide which facts they want to draw attention to, and which to leave out. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:27 am
We're taught from an early age to look left, right and back left again before crossing a street. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:05 pm
If you’re interested in going to the Netherlands this summer, this is the ticket. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 10:10 am
With its opinion of March 11, 2011 denying relief to a delegate from Iceland, the court released a Magistrate Judge's order In Re: §2703(d) Order. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:33 pm
Orders would be re-priced to one tick from the opposite of the national best bid or offer. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:30 am
They will not be able to stop in time to prevent a crash if you’re crossing the tracks. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
First, the proposed questions, assuming they’re prepared by an attorney and not the same college sophomore who lacks the knowledge and experience to formulate viable questions to be asked in person, are vetted before being asked to eliminate questions deemed irrelevant or offensive. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 12:43 pm
Open the crossings now. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:47 am
If you're driving on close-in East Burnside in Portland on Wednesday at lunchtime, you'd better stop for that person trying to cross. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:39 pm
But do female attorneys face an extra hurdle to overcome when it comes to giving a good cross—just because they’re women? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:06 am
The defense does not get to re-cross examine a witness. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
In In re Ruben Gonzalez, a cross-complainant filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to overturn the trial court’s order that required him to undergo a medical examination in a personal injury suit. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:28 pm
If you add pages in front of page 5 and page 5 becomes page 8 (or becomes page 4 because you deleted material), all you need to do is “re-generate” the reference (Tools, Reference, Cross-Reference, and Generate), and page 10 now refers to page 8 ~n or page 4 ~n or whatever. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 9:07 am
The judge may, on the judge's own motion or at the suggestion of a party, call witnesses, and all parties are entitled to cross-examine witnesses thus... [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:39 pm
People who are all the time crossing back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, from this side of the law to the other side, from this side to the other side. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 3:50 am
Last week the SEC re-proposed rule amendments originally proposed in 2015 to narrow an exemption from the requirement to be a FINRA member that is applicable to certain proprietary trading firms. [read post]
