Search for: "In Re Doe, III"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2016, 3:58 am
Does the business license of the Chinese company allow for foreign trade and thereby indicate that foreign remittances would not be unusual in the ordinary course of business? [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:19 am
You're putty in the hands of whoever developed that software. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:34 am
For our purposes, that is, in examining the possible criminal character of Trump’s “re-tweeting” of inflammatory and unverified anti-Muslim videos, (c) immediately above is germane. [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:55 pm
When All You Have is a Hammer, Everything Looks Like a NailIn re Tam and the Federal Circuit's Conflation of Federal Trademark Registration and the First AmendmentDrew Jurgensen In December 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) issued an en banc decision in the In Re Tam case. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Today we’re not.While we don’t claim to know much about the specifics, we’re aware that the FDA is going (or maybe already has) to lower the classification of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (that mouthful is thankfully abbreviated "PTCA") catheters from Class III to Class II. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 6:47 am
In a poignant moment in Godfather III, Al Pacino’s character says: “Just when I thought I was out… they pull me back in”. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:58 am
In re JetBlue" [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
Sure, some aliens are charged with the crime of illegal re-entry. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
What Does “Annual” Mean? [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:16 am
” In effect, there is Article III standing so long as the litigants really have a good reason to care about the outcome in light of the future of the institutions that they represent and who they are:If the official regularly engages in that conduct as part of his job (as Camreta does), he suffers injury caused by the adverse constitutional ruling. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In re Am. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:38 pm
In the In re Bea opinion published on May 29, 2015, this court determined that a person filing a Chapter 13 does not necessarily have to start making payments to secured creditors immediately after the filing of their case as long as those creditors do not object to the payments as proposed. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 4:42 pm
What if you think you’re selling meth, but the drug is really Chorionic Gonadotropin? [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 7:30 am
(Because TRAC does not name individual defendants, we haven’t been able to identify the two additional defendants.) [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:52 am
“Second, because Spokeo uses Newell’s persona for commercial gain—that is, to incentivize people to subscribe—it reasonably implies that his persona does have at least some commercial value. [read post]
14 May 2010, 12:40 pm
The statute creates a safe harbor for companies that encrypt their data (does anyone NOT encrypt their data these days??) [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 6:03 am
If Maatita is read as holding that a 3D design of indeterminate depth is, in fact, a single “design” under § 171, then the Federal Circuit has radically redefined the concept of a patentable “design” to a degree not seen since In re Zahn (I discuss that decision in Section III(A)(2) here). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:49 pm
Doe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Starbucks and Doe 1 v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 12:12 pm
Although the Netherlands does not take part in the adoption of the Rome III Regulation, there are scenarios in which Dutch citizens might be affected by it, given that the Regulation has a ‘universal’ character. [read post]
