Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2017, 10:36 am
Maybe, in the context of that sentence, he’s trying to persuade them they’re wrong rather than actually ask for a lawyer. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 2:04 pm
In his article, Professor Kerr goes on to argue that the best way to distinguish permitted entry is through a principle of authentication. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:27 pm
From Q&A posted earlier this year: Querying databases containing Section 702 information does not result in any new acquisition of data; it is instead only an examination or re-examination of previously acquired information. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:15 pm
In today’s world, in which we leave behind a lot of emails and other contents in the cloud after we’re gone, the answers matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
The Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act is the result of a serious re-think of all the defects found in the Cyber-safety Act. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 9:45 am
I’m biased, of course, but I think it’s worth your time if you’re interested in the Carpenter case. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm
In the meantime, the indictment against Hutchins serves as a useful illustration of the doctrine and a reminder of its continuing relevance. [1] Orin Kerr, The Kronos indictment: Is it a crime to create and sell malware? [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:54 am
But Orin Kerr throws a wet blanket on the outrage. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:59 am
And if you’re a persecutor, isn’t it cooler to be a low-key informal persecutor than an uptight formal one? [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Protection extends to the intrusion into a subject’s private and family life likely to result from the (re)publication of (private) information. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Lords Kerr and Wilson gave a joint dissenting judgment. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Lords Kerr and Wilson gave a joint dissenting judgment. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:39 am
Orin Kerr is the Fred C. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
They’re saying Hutchins and X conspired (formed an agreement) to send off the program (distributing it to the buyer) intending to cause damage (eventually, albeit indirectly, when the buyer later used it to cause damage). [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:35 am
I thought I would re-post a link to my guide for law students on how to read a legal opinion: “How to Read a Legal Opinion: A Guide for New Law Students. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
See In re Info. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
You’re at the Roger’s Centre, watching the Toronto Blue Jays play the Texas Rangers in game five of the American League Division series. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 1:02 pm
Whether you’re an employer facing a discrimination claim or an employee who believes you’ve been a victim of discrimination, you need knowledgeable employment counsel working on your behalf. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The summary given on hand down (given by Lord Sumption) is here: Lords Wilson and Kerr, dissenting, took view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson conclude that there was no basis for the presumption and, accordingly, the judge erred in dismissing the appellant’s application relying on that observation. [read post]
