Search for: "In Re Marriage of Full" Results 221 - 240 of 1,972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2021, 6:50 am by Russell Knight
“The Act does not require an equal division of marital property, but an equitable division” In re Marriage of Jones, 543 NE 2d 119 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1989 A party can ask for an equitable or unequal division of debts for a variety of reasons. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:48 pm by Helene L Taylor
If you’re thinking about divorce you want and need sound information about: Your present circumstances Family laws governing your marriage and possible divorce Your options. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm
One student states: "We're not interested in the part about marriage," and another: "Marriage is for white people. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:43 am
 Believe it or not, it’s this morning’s California Supreme Court decision in In re Marriage Cases, case no. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am by John Culhane
” It’s easier to put grandiose statements into a declaration when you’re writing a manifesto designed to free you from an oppressor (King George) than it is to put them into a constitution where you’re trying to hammer out the metal of governance. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
The full impact of these conflicts on military families may not be known for years," Karney said. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Guest Blogger
Indeed, as Elizabeth Scott observes, Failure to Flourish is full of concrete policy proposals for offering such support. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
"If you're in a second or subsequent marriage, you want to protect  your kids and you want to protect your assets," she says. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm by Jordan Bublick
 A decision issued in the Bankruptcy Court in Miami in 2009 in the case of In re Maria D. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
Before you say Columbia Law, you're wrong for the first time in years. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  We're making critical headway, and we absolutely couldn't have gotten this far without you. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm by Neil Siegel
It was neither the full-throated “equality” opinion Justice Scalia feared (with the implication that state bans on same-sex marriage were doomed), nor the straight-up “federalism” opinion Chief Justice Roberts hoped (with the implication that state bans were unaffected). [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
In In re Marriage of Ficke the wife, Julie, was recently laid off from a position where she was earning over $700,000.00 per year. [read post]