Search for: "In Re Miner"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am
” Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:46 am
.: The Atlantic Council will hold an event on creating sustainable and secure critical mineral supply chains. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
In this blog post . . . we’re going to highlight one of our tea blends . . . . [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 5:43 am
Here are updated materials in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:59 am
Sunscreen: Two class actions were filed challenging “mineral-based” sunscreen marketing claims on the grounds that the products (Blue Lizard and CVS brand) actually contain less desirable chemical ingredients that can cause skin irritation and allergic reactions. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 4:41 am
” As to the latter, Apollo argued that, to the extent that some leases covered fractional mineral interests in overlapping acreages, the term “affected leases” required Apache to offer all leases covering a given acreage, even if only one would be lost. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:55 pm
If you would like to access our physical resources, the Law Library has started its re-opening phase. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 10:55 am
Counterfeiting and re-use of compromised semiconductors presents an additional risk, including revenue loss and early or catastrophic failure of end systems. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 5:27 am
Legislation – 117th Congress Bulletinhttps://narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/117_uslegislation.html S.2071 – A bill to provide grants to States, territories, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and eligible Tribal entities to promote access to affordable, high-speed broadband and digital equity.S.2092 – A bill to permanently authorize the Native Community Development Financial Institutions lending program of the Department of Agriculture, and for other… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm
S.2177 - A bill to amend the Mineral Leasing Act to ensure sufficient bonding and complete and timely reclamation of land and water disturbed by Federal and Indian oil and gas production, and for other purposes. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
Pix Credit: U.S. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm
At trial, the defense re-asserted its objections to Moline’s opinion on cleavage fragments, but Judge Viscomi permitted Moline to testify about “non-asbestiform cleavage fragments from a medical point of view. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:02 pm
“Because they’re raw and minimally processed they are more likely to carry pathogens,” Waite-Cusic said. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am
Two of the plaintiffs’ experts testified that “non-asbestiform” minerals that are similar in size to asbestiform minerals can cause mesothelioma. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am
Two of the plaintiffs’ experts testified that “non-asbestiform” minerals that are similar in size to asbestiform minerals can cause mesothelioma. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am
Two of the plaintiffs’ experts testified that “non-asbestiform” minerals that are similar in size to asbestiform minerals can cause mesothelioma. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am
Bill Huizenga (R-Mich) to replace the executive compensation bill with a repeal of the Dodd-Frank Act’s pay ratio disclosure requirement and its provisions on conflict minerals, mine safety, and resource extraction issuers failed by a vote of 24-29. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:26 am
May 18, 2021 - 11 AM: In re BFY LLC, Serial No. 88606855 [Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark MULTEEZ for "Homeopathic pharmaceuticals, namely, vitamins," on the ground of mere descriptiveness.]May 25 2021 - 1 PM: In re Herman Miller, Inc., Serial No. 88027008 [Refusal to register a three-dimensional product configuration of a chair on the ground of de jure functionality under Section 2(e)(5).] [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:06 am
Res Judicata The parties agreed that the first two elements of res judicata were met, but they parted ways on the third—whether TRO-X’s claims could have been raised in Eagle I. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:06 am
Res Judicata The parties agreed that the first two elements of res judicata were met, but they parted ways on the third—whether TRO-X’s claims could have been raised in Eagle I. [read post]
