Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc." Results 221 - 240 of 986
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
In this sense, national courts will need to identify what makes a design an original work, also bearing in mind the CJEU’s considerations re technical features. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Accordingly, Section 1292(b) allows a district court to certify an issue for interlocutory appeal when: (1) the challenged ruling involves controlling questions of law, (2) there is substantial ground for difference of opinion on the ruling, and (3) an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm by Guest Blogger
It is “Court-centric” because it is, again, an account of “How the Supreme Court has Read the American Constitution. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
  Here, because Judge Furman also vacated the Secretary's directive (a vacatur the Supreme Court did not reverse), his additional "remand" order that the Supreme Court affirmed did not have much, if any, legal effect, as Judge Furman himself explained:[I]t is not entirely clear what it would mean to refrain from remand in the circumstances of these cases. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 12:01 pm
  But that's not actually the standard the Supreme Court set. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  That is, in theory we’re looking for symbols that perform a source-identifying function. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Is the Board unaware of Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence going back almost 8 decades? [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
I didn’t include 2018 and 2019 since there seems to be a lag in receiving 2018 decisions from the CQ (we think it’s because of a backlog in redactions to be made in the Chambre de la jeunesse decisions in case you are asking) and since we’re only half into 2019. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Circuit and on the Supreme Court, in the Office of Legal Counsel at the height of the Reagan administration, and as a founder of The Federalist Society. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 The background is that the Supreme Court said a bunch of things in lawyer regulation cases about when you could ban speech versus when the regulator had to mandate a disclosure instead—this line of cases treated disclosures as speech protective and minimally invasive, and they haven’t been reconciled with the anti-disclosure cases. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:38 pm by Will Baude
When we rethink the stare decisis effect of Supreme Court opinions, I will reconsider outside briefing, virtual or otherwise. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
It is the register in which dissident citizens and, indeed, majorities of the Supreme Court appeal to the people against themselves, as Thoreau put it in his essay on civil disobedience. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s just disingenuous at best in endorsing a distinction between nondigital and digital copies that does not make sense of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “origin,” especially in light of the Office’s (correct) position in discussions of first sale that a digital copy stored on a computer is a reproduction. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:12 am by William Ford
Examples of specialized experience include: performing legal analysis and formulating recommendations to senior managers; composing pleadings, briefs, and other court documents involving legal issues in civil or criminal litigation; and conducting civil or criminal litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:28 am by William Ford
Supreme Court challenging the Commerce Department’s decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by William Ford
Supreme Court challenging the Commerce Department’s decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Supreme Court challenging the Commerce Department’s decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
She has also served as the Supreme Court correspondent for The Washington Post and USA Today. [read post]