Search for: "In Re Special Grand Jury Investigation" Results 221 - 240 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 11:34 am by Scott R. Anderson
Circuit concluded that grand jury and trial subpoenas could pierce executive privilege only when the requested information was shown to be “important to [the] investigation and practically unavailable elsewhere. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
When the President gave the order, “substantial evidence” (to quote the Report) existed that the President was aware that he was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present evidence of the President’s criminality to a grand jury, which satisfies the nexus requirement. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm by John Floyd
  U.S, Attorney General William Barr has made clear to the public that he will redact all grand jury material compiled during the 22-month investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller into whether Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign coordinated efforts with Russians to secure the American presidency. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Victoria Clark
Fogel and Taylor questioned whether Congress will ever see all of Mueller’s grand jury material. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Margaret Taylor
Congress has managed twice to obtain federal grand jury information in prior special counsel investigations, as Nadler noted in an April 11 letter to Barr: In every other instance where a federal grand jury was used to probe the alleged misconduct of a sitting president—namely, in the Watergate and Starr investigations—the Department of Justice worked with the relevant federal court to release the grand jury… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:12 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
While we were still self-consciously behind the veil of ignorance about what Special Counsel Robert Mueller had concluded, it seemed like a good time to lay out some ground rules for how to read it fairly. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am by Jeremy Gordon
A significant amount of evidence contained in the report is likely to have been collected through grand jury proceedings; in fact, grand jury evidence has already played an important role in a number of the prosecutions the special counsel’s office conducted. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:05 am by Stephen Bates
In court, Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski said that the grand jury had materials to submit to the judge: an indictment and a sealed report. [read post]
” It may or may not be significant that Barr does not here make references to U.S. persons not affiliated with the Trump campaign, as he did when describing the special counsel’s investigation of the IRA’s efforts. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:48 am by SHG
“Following an investigation commenced by our Office in March 2017, a Manhattan grand jury has charged Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 11:06 am by Chuck Rosenberg
Bharara introduces us to some of the best investigators with whom he worked: One, Kenny McCabe, reminds us that, unlike some politicians, “if you need to say you’re tough, then you aren’t; if you need to say you are feared, then you aren’t. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:30 am by Doug Cornelius
(That’s the “naked” part.) http://www.radicalcompliance.com/2019/03/05/2-mill-fine-weak-compliance/ McKenna On Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway, and Kraft Heinz in re: The Auditors Has Warren Buffett run out of long-run? [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
But the legal issues at stake in In re Grand Jury Investigation—concerning Roger Stone associate Andrew Miller’s challenge to subpoenas issued by the special counsel’s office—directly map onto Calabresi’s argument against the constitutionality of Mueller’s appointment under the Appointments Clause, on the one hand, and Conway’s rebuttal to it on Lawfare, on the other. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:54 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Circuit ruled in In re: Grand Jury Investigation that DAG Rosenstein's appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel did not violate the Appointments Clause. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm by Lev Sugarman
Mikhaila Fogel posted a brief filed by Solicitor General Noel Francisco in In Re Grand Jury Subpoena arguing for a Supreme Court denial of the anonymous corporation’s petition for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
I ran across Rodino’s letter in a passing reference in my recent research on the Watergate “Road Map”—the grand jury report that Watergate Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski referred to the House judiciary committee in 1974. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Following the Supreme Court’s decision not to intervene in In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, the mystery case of the subpoena that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is trying to enforce against an unnamed foreign state-owned company, the D.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:16 am by Scott Harman
Circuit left undecided in its recent opinion in In re Grand Jury Subpoena, a case assumed to be tied to the special counsel’s investigation. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:54 am by William Ford
Circuit’s decision to uphold a contempt citation against the unnamed defendant in In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, the mystery case of the subpoena Special Counsel Robert Mueller filed against a foreign bank. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re previewed the case for this blog. [read post]